User talk:Charmdozo

Uhhh yes Telematerialization has alot to do with Telekinetic orbing. one telematerialization is a form of telekinesis plus apportation so is Teekinetic orbing. to go further since telekinetic orbing is the exact same thing except mixed with whitelighters orbing. Sure i may of added some of my views wiht hte psychic thing whic is totally acceptable to go ahead and edit and delete that whole thing on it. BUt dont say it has nothign to do with it Telekinetic orbing it very much does Jay prev 15:58, January 21, 2012 (UTC)jay_prev

Change if You really think it not helping this Wiki
what fine it wont change what i believe but if you really think so go ahead and change it completely, and yea you rite badly written i could definetly do better then that and make it flow correctly with it. So by all means change it but you got to admit i make a comparable argument. Jay prev 16:15, January 21, 2012 (UTC)

Im thinking about making a page specifically for Psychic Witches through out the Series, How do i do that
I'm seriousl contemplating creating a Charemed Wiki page for psychic powers, and so and so  forth. How would i acomplish this feat and how would a editor check it (before or after i publish this). And are their requirements for doing that. If so what are they? Jay prev 16:32, January 21, 2012 (UTC)

Gifs
It's fine, I'll make one, but, if I remember well, I think that Sirk didn't fire a thermal ball, only held it. However, I'll make that as soon as I can. (: -- Shimmeringpumpkin 11:16, January 23, 2012 (UTC)

Finished. I hope you're satisfied. -- Shimmeringpumpkin 12:12, January 24, 2012 (UTC)

No problem. If there is any other to be made, feel free to contact me. -- Shimmeringpumpkin 13:14, January 24, 2012 (UTC)

Pages
Hi Charmdozo, I have add some comments on a talk page about Spell Nullification. Charmednut 14:45 January 24, 2012

What's your problem?
Did you forget that this is a wiki and that everyone continues to edit and update articles? I created articles that others have changed so much that nothing is left of my original work. That normal. And in my opinion, your edits reduced the quality of the articles. -- PerryPeverell 10:26, January 31, 2012 (UTC)


 * But your edits on those articles were pretty much worthless. You've erased most, if not all of the text that was on the weapon page and put all pictures in an ugly gallery for no reason. I was merely making the articles look better, like they used to. -- PerryPeverell 10:36, January 31, 2012 (UTC)


 * And your version was clean? -- PerryPeverell 10:42, January 31, 2012 (UTC)


 * Erasing pictures from several sections and putting them in one gallery does not equal a clean look. -- PerryPeverell 10:56, January 31, 2012 (UTC)